Search type
Optimaite Law
Fuzzy + semantic
RA-MICRO Konflikt
Exact string
Conflicts · Module
Conflicts you see — before they become conflicts.
Optimaite Law screens — in under 3 seconds — every active, archived and potential matter against the new client, the opponent, their directors, group structure and member relationships. You see hits with reasoning — and decide with BRAO-compliant documentation.
What the AI takes over
AI screens direct and transitive conflicts (group, identical directors, shareholder chains) in seconds.
In comparison
Optimaite conflict check vs. RA-MICRO conflict module
Group tracing
Optimaite Law
Up to 3+ levels
RA-MICRO Konflikt
None
Director match
Optimaite Law
Automatic via HRB
RA-MICRO Konflikt
Manually maintained
Speed (50k matters)
Optimaite Law
<3 sec
RA-MICRO Konflikt
20-60 sec or more
Audit doc
Optimaite Law
Auto-PDF with reasoning
RA-MICRO Konflikt
Manual note
AI in the background
How conflict checking runs in Optimaite
Four layers: direct match, identical directors, group affiliation, transitive shareholdings.
- 01Was die KI macht
AI extracts from the mandate inquiry all parties: client, opponent, directors, ultimate beneficial owners (UBO), intervenors.
Was Sie entscheidenYou see the participant graph — add or exclude persons.
- 02Was die KI macht
Layer 1: AI does direct name matching across all matters — fuzzy for spelling variants ('Muster GmbH' = 'Muster G.m.b.H.'), commercial register, VAT ID.
→ M-2023-0091 — Muster GmbH = Muster G.m.b.H. (HRB 67342)
Was Sie entscheidenHits are color-coded: red (same party), yellow (related person), green (no conflict).
- 03Was die KI macht
Layer 2: AI checks director identity — if 'Max Mustermann' is director at client A and opponent B, that's a conflict.
Was Sie entscheidenData comes from commercial register extracts or your KYC process — AI connects the dots.
- 04Was die KI macht
Layer 3: AI traces group affiliation — parent/subsidiary/sub-subsidiary, including holdings and trust structures.
Was Sie entscheidenYou see the group tree with conflict nodes marked — decide on acceptance with reasoning.
- 05Was die KI macht
Layer 4: Transitive shareholdings — 'client A owns 30% of X, opponent B owns 25% of X' — AI flags for review.
Was Sie entscheidenYou weigh: no direct conflict, but reject mandate or disclose to client? Decision is saved with reasoning.
- 06Was die KI macht
AI documents the decision: who checked (lawyer ID), when (timestamp), which conflicts (hit list), how decided (acceptance/rejection with reasoning), what client disclosure occurred.
Was Sie entscheidenFor bar-association queries the documentation is printed in 30 seconds — BRAO-compliant.
Berufsträger-Kontrolle. The conflict engine doesn't replace legal judgment — it provides the data basis. Every mandate acceptance remains a conscious lawyer decision; the system only documents.
Built in, not bolted on
Four building blocks working together.
Fuzzy name matching
Recognizes 'Muster GmbH' = 'Muster G.m.b.H.', 'GmbH' = 'limited liability company', tolerates typos and language variants.
Commercial register integration
Direct query against the German commercial register (HRB/HRA) — directors, proxies, shareholders, partners are auto-imported.
Group relations visualised
Group trees as interactive graph. Conflict nodes marked; depth configurable (typically 3 levels).
UBO detection
Ultimate beneficial owners from trust and holding structures are detected — relevant for AML compliance (GwG).
Whitelist / blacklist
Specific clients or opponents can be explicitly blocked or released for mandates — beyond matter lifetime.
Audit log with reasoning
Every conflict check, decision and client disclosure is documented. Export as PDF for bar association or insurance.
Status quo
Today this costs time. With Optimaite it no longer does.
Ohne Optimaite
String match misses many
Legacy conflict checks search 'Muster GmbH' and miss 'Muster Beteiligungs AG' (same director) or 'Muster Holding' (group parent). That's exactly where professional-liability cases arise.
Mit Optimaite Law
AI extracts from the mandate inquiry all parties: client, opponent, directors, ultimate beneficial owners (UBO), intervenors.
Ohne Optimaite
Conflict documentation on paper
When the bar association asks 'When was the conflict checked, who decided?' — the answer sits in an email in the archive. At best.
Mit Optimaite Law
Layer 1: AI does direct name matching across all matters — fuzzy for spelling variants ('Muster GmbH' = 'Muster G.m.b.H.'), commercial register, VAT ID.
→ M-2023-0091 — Muster GmbH = Muster G.m.b.H. (HRB 67342)
Ohne Optimaite
Large-firm reality: 50,000 matters
With 50,000+ active matters and 200 lawyers, conflict checking isn't 'someone looks it up' — it's a systematic bottleneck.
Mit Optimaite Law
Layer 2: AI checks director identity — if 'Max Mustermann' is director at client A and opponent B, that's a conflict.
Working together
Related modules
Case Management
AI assigns matters and parties · detects deadlines · opens ticklers · measures realisation and utilisation — you run the mandate.
Client Portal
AI sorts client-uploaded documents automatically into the matter and notifies the responsible lawyer.
Intelligent Inbox
AI sorts · extracts docket numbers, parties and deadlines · routes the case to the right associate — you confirm in one click.
FAQ
Questions about Conflict Checking
Alles Wichtige zu Betrieb, Sicherheit und Einstieg — kurz beantwortet.
Ihre Frage ist nicht dabei?
Wir zeigen Ihnen die Plattform gerne live und beantworten alles Weitere im persönlichen Gespräch.
Demo buchenOptimaite Law
See conflicts before others do.
30-minute demo: we screen one of your hypothetical new mandates against your existing book and show the four conflict layers in action.
14 Tage kostenlos testen · Keine Kreditkarte · DSGVO-konform
