Microsoft Word add-in
Full Word compatibility (Mac & Windows). Tracked changes, comments, version history — Optimaite adds to Word, doesn't replace it.
Optimaite Law doesn't draft in a chat window — it drafts directly inside your Word document or Optimaite Editor. With case content, BGH case law and your clause library in context. Every AI change appears as a tracked change — you accept, reject, comment.
AI drafts inside the document, with a BGH source behind every argument — your pen stays in your hand.
Copy-paste from three tools
Facts from the case file, case law from juris/beck-online, template from the Word folder. Every brief starts with 20 minutes of copy-pasting.
ChatGPT hallucinates judgments
Generic chatbots invent docket numbers or cite false guiding principles. In a brief, that's a liability trap — and embarrassing in front of the senate.
No track changes in chat
If the AI replies in chat, you must paste the suggestion into the document by hand. Iterations with client and senior partner become Sisyphean.
AI collects from the case file: parties, caption, procedural posture, required exhibits, prior briefs and all rulings to date.
AI queries the connected case-law database (BGH, BVerfG, regional courts, RIS, juris connector optional) for matching guiding principles — full-text linked, never hallucinated.
→ BGH, judgment of 14 May 2024 — VI ZR 312/23, guiding principle 2
AI structures the brief along your firm template: caption, motions, reasoning under A. I., A. II., B. — tailored to the brief type (brief-in-support of appeal, defense, statement).
Full Word compatibility (Mac & Windows). Tracked changes, comments, version history — Optimaite adds to Word, doesn't replace it.
If you want out of Word: a native editor with layout fidelity, clause library, automatic table-of-contents and PDF/A export.
Direct integration with public case-law databases plus optional juris and beck-online connectors. Full-text links instead of invented docket numbers.
Your battle-tested phrases — settlement offers, litigation conduct declarations, standard motions — are used by the AI as preferred templates.
Multilingual briefs
ECJ proceedings in English, Vienna arbitration in German + English in parallel — Optimaite keeps translations in sync.
Final review with coherence check
Before dispatch: does the brief contain all motions? Are all factual claims subsumed? Is the deadline observed? Are exhibits referenced?
The AI brings the case file, case law and clause library into the brief — not into a chat. You stay in Word or in the Optimaite Editor.
AI collects from the case file: parties, caption, procedural posture, required exhibits, prior briefs and all rulings to date.
Your call: You see a 200-word case brief — everything the AI will use — and add or remove items.
AI queries the connected case-law database (BGH, BVerfG, regional courts, RIS, juris connector optional) for matching guiding principles — full-text linked, never hallucinated.
→ BGH, judgment of 14 May 2024 — VI ZR 312/23, guiding principle 2
Your call: Every hit comes with docket number, date, guiding principle and deep link. You choose which to include.
AI structures the brief along your firm template: caption, motions, reasoning under A. I., A. II., B. — tailored to the brief type (brief-in-support of appeal, defense, statement).
Your call: The structure appears as an outline; you can reorder it or explicitly hide sections.
AI drafts directly inside Word or the Optimaite Editor — as tracked changes. Every paragraph with a source: case file, BGH ruling, firm clause.
Your call: You accept, reject or comment as with a junior associate. Sources are one hover-hint away.
AI runs a coherence check: any motion missing? Are facts complete? Are all argued points subsumed? Is the deadline met?
Your call: The final check is a dense 8-15 item report — typically it surfaces two or three meaningful gaps.
AI files the signature-ready brief in the case folder, generates a PDF/A for beA and attaches exhibits automatically.
Your call: You sign with a qualified signature and dispatch via the beA module — AI logs dispatch and deadline fulfilment.
Lawyer in control. The AI is a junior associate, not a senior. Every action remains reviewable and traceable to sources. Your matters are never used to train AI models.
Inside Word or Optimaite Editor
In a chat window, separate copy-paste
Full case file automatically
At most what you paste into the prompt
BGH/BVerfG integration with full-text link
Training cutoff, often hallucinated
Native, with source hover
Manual paste from chat
GDPR + BRAO §43e + §203 StGB compliant
Training data unclear, mostly US-hosted
No. The research engine queries real BGH/BVerfG/regional-court databases and returns full-text links. If no matching ruling exists, the AI says so — it doesn't invent one. Sources are mandatory on every cited argument.
Yes. Upload your clause library (Word, OpenDocument or Markdown) once — the AI uses it preferentially from the next brief onwards. Configurable per practice area, per client or per lawyer.
Yes. AI processing takes place within the agreed operating and privacy model. On-premise variants are available; a §43e BRAO-compliant DPA is included.
A defense brief of medium complexity (8-12 pages) takes 25-45 minutes in practice — from case context to signature-ready document. The same brief without AI: 2-4 hours.
Case Management
AI assigns matters and parties · detects deadlines · opens ticklers · measures realisation and utilisation — you run the mandate.
Intelligent Inbox
AI sorts · extracts docket numbers, parties and deadlines · routes the case to the right associate — you confirm in one click.
Billing & Accounting
AI auto-bundles unbilled hours and expenses into batch invoices · checks subject value and frame fee · monitors dunning levels and default interest — you approve.
30-minute demo: send us an anonymized fact pattern, we draft the brief together — tracked changes, BGH sources, beA dispatch included.
14-day trial · no credit card · data residency: Frankfurt